Skip to content
Extraits de code Groupes Projets
  1. sept. 02, 2015
  2. août 19, 2015
  3. juil. 31, 2015
  4. juil. 26, 2015
  5. juil. 03, 2015
  6. juin 25, 2015
  7. juin 24, 2015
  8. juin 22, 2015
  9. juin 19, 2015
  10. juin 17, 2015
  11. juin 11, 2015
  12. juin 05, 2015
  13. juin 03, 2015
  14. mai 31, 2015
  15. mai 09, 2015
  16. avr. 30, 2015
  17. avr. 27, 2015
  18. avr. 23, 2015
  19. avr. 21, 2015
  20. avr. 17, 2015
  21. mars 31, 2015
    • Thomas Steur's avatar
      Faster archiving of aggregated reports, also performance imprvovements in general · 1a148fb6
      Thomas Steur a rédigé
      * Store subtables in chunks of 100 subtables per blob. Those 100 subtables are stored
        serialized as an array: array($subtableID => subtableBlob). The first 100 subtables are
        stored in "chunk_0", the next 100 subtables are stored in "chunk_1", ...
      * Subtable Ids are now consecutive from 1 to X
      * We do no longer serialize the whole Row instance when archiving, instead we only
        serialize the Row's array which contains columns, metadata and datatable. This is not
        only more efficient but allows us to refactor the Row instance in the future (although
        we will always have to be BC)
      * Faster row implementation: Columns, Metadata and Subtables access is much faster now
      1a148fb6
  22. mars 10, 2015
  23. fév. 23, 2015
  24. fév. 21, 2015
  25. fév. 18, 2015
  26. fév. 12, 2015
  27. fév. 10, 2015
    • Thomas Steur's avatar
      refs #6809 a couple of performance improvements for the all websites report. · 6c0db645
      Thomas Steur a rédigé
      I tested it with 4k websites. The change made it only a couple of seconds faster
      but requesting 4k websites would still take 4-8 seconds even if only 10 sites of
      them are actually requested. For example before we did request each site 3 times
      (12k times in total and triggered 12k events etc) which should be no longer the case.
      The last `clearSiteCache` was there to free some memory but I think it shouldn't
      be problematic to remove it. Also I removed one 'sort' as a lot of time is wasted
      there. It should be in theory sorted afterwards anyway again. Need to see test
      results whether this change is good or not.
      6c0db645
  28. fév. 09, 2015
  29. jan. 27, 2015
  30. jan. 15, 2015
  31. jan. 12, 2015
  32. jan. 08, 2015
  33. jan. 05, 2015
Chargement en cours